.
| [Reprinted from The
Freeman, March, 1939] |
Capitalism is a social order in which the use, enjoyment and ownership
of things produced by human exertion are recognized by custom and law as
the inviolable right of the producer.
Except in a few historical instances, in societies where primitive
modes of production prevailed, capitalism has never been allowed to
function. Privilege, the political mechanism for transferring ownership
from the laborers to non-producers, has in various degrees prevailed
though-out history; in modern times this mechanism is being employed to
completely destroy capitalism.
With increasing knowledge of the arts of production -- including the
art of exchange -- men learned to produce for future enjoyment.
Immediate needs were easily satisfied, and the surplus was set aside for
increased facility of production; that is Capital.
If all who engage in the production of wealth share in its possession
in proportion to their contribution of energy, skill or knowledge, there
can be no quarrel with such division; for that would accord with our
innate sense of justice. The diversion from producers to non-producers,
by whatever means accomplished, not only arouses a sense of hurt, but
also discourages the production of a sufficient amount to satisfy
desires. Thus, the interference with Capitalism tends to poverty.
The means employed to divert wealth from producers to non-producers
vary from simple robbery by individuals to organized pillage by highly
skilled pressure groups. The latter are the most vicious, because their
depredations are sanctified by law and custom, and enforced by the power
of police.
This latter method came into vogue with the settlement of peoples in
permanent places, when nomadic seeking of satisfactions was replaced by
localized utilization of the forces of nature, and by exchange. This
localization of labor emphasized the primacy of land in the production
of wealth. The necessity of using land was transformed by the
non-producers into a privilege through the mechanism of titles. Their
confiscation of rent became the measure of this privilege. By the
machinery of law this privilege was perpetuated and made transferrable,
whereby it became a perpetual drain upon production.
The demand for natural resources kept pace with the advance in the arts
of production, and the tribute demanded by non-producers who had
acquired title by force, chicanery, legacy, or purchase, increased
accordingly. The constantly diminishing share to producers turned their
thoughts to relief, not by abolishing the privilege of collecting rent,
but by seeking privileges for themselves -- that is, by also demanding "something
for nothing." Whether this resulted from ignorance as to the cause
of their plight, or from the difficulty of dislodging the entrenched
landowners, is immaterial.
Among the privilege techniques devised by the producers were subsidies,
tariffs, tithes, patents, preferential labor laws. But the privileges
gained by one group of producers could be satisfied only at the expense
of other groups; every advantage presupposes a disadvantage. The medium
of these trepidations was the Tax. As this burden on production
increased, more and more pressure groups sought relief, causing an
increase of taxes to the point where the little left to the producers
seriously threatens their ability to live.
That is the condition of Capitalism today. Crushed between the tribute
demanded by the landowners for permission to use the earth, and taxes
demanded by other privilege-seekers, its powers of production are being
destroyed. It can succeed in its function of supplying human
satisfactions only in proportion to its ability to throw off the
vultures of privilege.
Capitalism has not failed -- because it never has been tried. What kind
of civilization we may have, how high the aspirations of man may soar in
a social order where private property is free from monopoly privileges
and from governmental pilfering, is get to be determined.
|