






















|
Henry George, A Remembrance
John Sherwin Crosby
[An address delivered at the funeral of Henry George,
31 October 1897. Repinted in the booklet, Addresses at the Funeral
of Henry George, compiled by Edmund Yardley in 1905 and published
by The Public Publishing Company, Chicago]
Now followed a scene that will never be
forgotten by those who witnessed it The ceremonies were over, --
at least so the audience thought. The impressive tones of
McClynn's voice and the applause that followed his speech were
dying away. It was a fitting climax, so it seemed, that the last
words over the great leader dead, should be said by one who
stood so close to him in life as the eloquent priest of St.
Stephen's. Some on the outer seats rose to go, when a man who
was a stranger to most of the assembly stepped to the front of
the platform. Who could this be that dared to follow McGlynn?
Surely he did not realize the task he had undertaken. Yet the
fine presence of the man, the resonant tones of his voice
immediately commanded attention. The speaker was John Sherwin
Crosby, who had been selected by the committee, with excellent
judgment as it proved, to close the ceremonies. Those who had
risen, turned around, - listened, - sat down. In a moment the
applause was renewed, wilder, more enthusiastically than before.
Not cheering, as some of the papers had it, - those who longed
to cheer were restrained by the presence of the dead, - but
tumultuous hand-clapping. The unknown orator had captured his
audience as no other had that day, and they responded to his
eloquent words as the tree-tops sway to the gale. It was no
longer of Henry George the man, that the orator spoke, but of
Henry George the fallen leader in a great cause - a cause dear
to his hearers' hearts; and the applause that went up was as the
shout of a host rushing to the battle. It was exultant, defiant;
the orator before them breathed their spirit, spoke with their
voice, and they went wild with enthusiasm.
|
I should not, my friends, even if there were time, here attempt any
eulogy of the dear friend whose loss we mourn. I have not the command
of language or of feeling requisite to an adequate expression of any
part of the measureless praise that is due and will be accorded to
this brave tribune of the people. Standing here in his presence, as it
seems to me, I feel that if those mute lips could break the silence
that enchains them we should hear him say: "Speak not of me, but
of the principles I have advocated. I have laid down my life in the
struggle to secure their practical recognition in the politics of my
country. I call on you who remain upon the scene of action to continue
that struggle; to keep up the fight until victory is won " [The
audience burst into applause.]
Here on this sad Sabbath day, the day that was made for man, at the
open-standing portals through which our beloved leader has passed from
time to the eternity that awaits us all, let us ask, and answer if we
can, this question: Why is it that at the death of this plain,
unassuming man, who, although known throughout the world, never held
station of worldly honor; whose writings have seldom appeared in dress
more pretentious than a cheap paper cover, having been slighted and
discredited by concerted action of those whose office it is to make
known whatever truth may be discovered; why is it that thousands of
men and women are today assembled, not only here at his funeral by the
Atlantic, but on the other side of the continent by the Pacific, at
this same hour, in that very hall in San Francisco where he first gave
public utterance to his sublime theories? [Applause.] Why is it that
not only in this country but throughout all lands there is this
unprecedented manifestation of a universal, common sorrow at his loss?
Is it because he was a good man? He was a good man. No whiter soul
ever winged its way to regions of celestial peace. But other good men
have died, are dying every day, and yet we see no such demonstration
as this. An able man? Men of the greatest ability are constantly
passing away, but they are paid no such tribute as that accorded to
this man. Why, then, this world-wide mourning?
This man had a theory - was said to be a man of one idea. If that
theory be false, that idea a mere vagary, why, as he passes away, does
the world rise and stand uncovered in honor of the man who proclaimed
it? It is the natural, universally spontaneous recognition of Henry
George's theory as an essential part of God's eternal truth.
[Tremendous applause.]
One word about this theory of his. Much has been truly and eloquently
said in regard to the probable effects of its adoption. He believed
that when put into practice it would, by removing the cause,
eventually result in the abolition of involuntary poverty. There are
those who say that he was over sanguine as to results, which they
assert could not be so beneficent and far-reaching as he thought. But
it matters not, my friends, what the result would be. That is not your
business or mine. Shall we stop to discuss results before doing what
we know to be right? If so, how long? Henry George has demonstrated
beyond all question that what he demands, that all he asks, is simple
justice. [Great applause.]
It has been said that he threatened established institutions.
Threatened? He has not only threatened them; he has shaken them to
their foundations. [Prolonged applause.] Threatened your institutions,
has he? To whom have you built statues in your cities but to men who
threatened your institutions? Your Garrisons and Phillipses, your
Lincolns, Sumners and Sewards, all threatened institutions defended in
their time by pulpit and press, as you know. Yes, Henry George has
threatened established institutions, and they are now tottering to
their fall, because not founded on the eternal rock of justice, but
built upon the shifting sands of expediency.
Henry George believed in the Declaration of Independence; accepted
the self-evident truth of its sublime preamble that every man has, by
the very nature of his being, certain inalienable rights; rights
derived not from governments; rights, of his absolute, indefeasible
title to which no government or established order can deprive him;
rights, chief among which is the right to a place on earth. [Great
applause.] He saw that one man has as much and the same right on earth
as another, and that if one man has as much right as another, no man
can have any more right than another. [Applause.]
This man was no dreamer. He had no plan for remodeling the state or
reconstructing society. Plato in his "Republic," More in "Utopia,"
Bacon and Bellamy have given us visions of society arbitrarily moulded
according to man's finite conception of what it ought to be. They
proposed to deal with results rather than causes - giving little
thought as to the feasibility or justice of means by which their
dreams were to be realized. Henry George, on the other hand, in his
great book "Progress and Poverty," beginning with
fundamental principles, absolute truth, with axioms, as in
mathematics, proceeds by logical deductions to inevitable conclusions.
And no man yet has ever answered him. [Great applause. A voice: "And
no man ever will."] Exalted as he was in sublimity of political
wisdom, he held himself not aloof from the uncongenial associations
incident to practical politics, and shirked no humblest duty of the
citizen. To the very last hour he was earnestly endeavoring to arouse
all men, men of every class and station, the men of this great
metropolis and of the world, to a sense of personal responsibility for
the continuance of institutional wrongs; urging them to demand at
every point that justice be done by the government we are all
compelled to uphold. [Great applause.]
There lie the remains of a man who was Thomas Jefferson reincarnate.
[Sensation.] Greater even than Jefferson, for, although the latter saw
the injustice and denied the right of so-called private property in
land, not to him but to this man was it given to demonstrate to the
world how the natural, common, equal, inalienable right of all men to
the earth may be secured to all without injury to any, and without
disturbance to society. He demonstrated, moreover, that unless that
right be secured it is in vain that we pray "Thy kingdom come."
[Great applause:] When we pray for the coming of God's kingdom, and
the doing of His will upon earth, do we expect the answer to come all
at once? Through some change in the climate or the order of the
seasons? By any standing still of the sun? It must come, if at all,
through some change in the institutions, customs and laws that we
ignorantly maintain in opposition to the will of God. By whom is that
will to be done on earth if not by the men and women living upon it?
Emerson has said that every great reform was once a thought in the
mind of some one man. What was once but a thought in the mind of this
one man has become a force that moves the world today. [Vociferous
applause.]
As Paul stood on Mars Hill and proclaimed to the Athenians the
Unknown God whom they ignorantly worshipped, so this man for the last
quarter of a century has stood aloft proclaiming democracy to
democrats. I speak not of any party, but of all men who, with
Jefferson and Lincoln, still ask: "If we cannot trust the people
to govern themselves, whom can we trust to govern them?" Speaking
to such men, Henry George has been saying: "Jeffersonian
democracy which you ignorantly worship, that I declare unto you."
The political party, be it called Democratic or Republican, or by any
other name, that does not recognize the equal right of every man to a
place on earth - the government that fails to secure that right - must
eventually go down, as parties, governments and civilizations have
gone down in the past. [Tremendous applause.] But I will not detain
you. [Cries of "Go on," "Go on," and applause.]
If I thought that things were to go on as they are - and as some in
high places tell us that they must, in the order of Providence,
continue to go on - my prayer would be for God to stop the
multiplication of a race, the majority of whom are to know only
poverty, degradation and shame. That is what we should pray for if we
believe the existing social disorder to be the natural order. But if
we have faith in God, and believe that whenever He makes a thing right
He also makes it practicable, then may we pray, hope and work, as did
Henry George, for the coming of the kingdom. [Great applause.]
Newton's discovery of the law of gravitation was not more essential
to an understanding of physical phenomena than is the theory of Henry
George to an intelligent comprehension of the principles of political
economy and civil government. The single tax, or "natural
taxation," is in reality not a tax, not a taking of private
revenue, but simply an appropriation by the public of a revenue which,
in its very source and nature, is essentially public, and therefore
belongs to the public. Long ago in the book of Ecclesiastes was it
written: "The profit of the earth is for all"; long ago in
the book of Proverbs: "In all labor there is profit"; and
the problem of all the centuries since has been how to effect a just
distribution of these two kinds of profit. It was the mission of Henry
George to solve that problem - the problem of poverty, the labor
problem, the problem that underlies all other social problems. And he
has solved it. He has pointed out the way, the only way, in which the
profit of the earth may be shared by all, the only way in which the
profit of labor can be secured to the laborer. His work finished, his
mission ended, he hears the welcome summons: "Well done, good and
faithful servant."
The body of Henry George lies here. His soul has gone to the bosom of
his Father. And soon his body, by gentle hands uplifted and followed
by loving hearts, will be borne to peaceful Greenwood, there to rest
upon the bosom of his mother Earth, her child, the one who above all
others of his time realized and recognized the common, equal
brotherhood of all her children. [Prolonged applause.]
|