






















|
The Wealth of the Nation,
Is It In Good Hands?
Edward J. Dodson
[Reprinted from
GroundSwell, November-December, 2004]
Guided by Henry George's insights into the operation of political
economy, we understand that a tendency exists for wealth to become
increasingly concentrated in the hands of fewer and fewer individuals.
We sense this is occurring in the United States, despite a long
history of programs to provide poorer citizens with a safety net. As
each year passes, the number of people who slide in the categorization
of the "working poor" increases. A key reason for their
deteriorating financial circumstance is, of course, the cost of
housing. Renters are particularly at risk, but many homeowners have a
difficult time finding the cash to maintain their home and to pay
property taxes.
Analysts who track the amount of savings by the U.S. population
report that the personal savings rate has fallen to less than 1
percent of disposable income. This compares to a savings rate of over
10 percent in countries such as France, Italy or Germany.
While it is certainly true that all too many Americans spend all or
more than they receive as income, borrowing and extending payments on
their debt over long periods of time, it is also true that many of us
are the beneficiaries of landed wealth. We know this is not as it
should be, but this broad if moderate depth of individual wealth held
in land value seems to keep the U.S. economy from imploding. This is a
complex relationship, to be sure. The increases in residential land
values are welcomed by those nearing or in retirement. If they are
living on a relatively low, fix income (e.g., on social security
benefits), they can increase their income by exchanging the equity
they have in their house and land by entering into a "reverse
mortgage" arrangement. Or, they can sell their property and move
to a lower cost location.
Economists estimate that the average household net worth in the
United States is now over $380,000, an increase of $100,000 in a
decade. Of course, the bottom 10 percent of all households have no net
worth at all. A recent Wall Street Journal report referred to research
by Dartmouth College economics professor Jonathan Skinner which
indicates "roughly one-third of Americans arrive at retirement
unprepared and are forced to cut their consumption by as much as 30%
to survive."
We are deep into a period of great economic uncertainty. The current
administration continues to believe that deep cuts in the marginal tax
rates of the wealthiest income recipients will achieve a Laffer-like
supply-side increase in the tax base. As we have seen, the increased
disposable incomes for the top 10 percent of the population has gone
into real estate and the stock market. Wealthy Americans are not even
taking much of this income and "investing" it in U.S.
government securities. They are leaving this up to foreign investors.
As the government's need continues to issue more and more debt, the
pressure on interest rates to rise is inevitable. The annual interest
payments required on $8 trillion of debt at a rate of 5 percent is
$400 billion. At some point, reality must set in: the Bush economic
team must face up to the need to increase revenue from taxation. The
most likely measure they will endorse is some form of national sales
tax or a value-added tax.
So, I ask again: Is the wealth of the nation in good hands?
|