.
| [Reprinted from the
Henry George News, March, 1960] |
Any person who has studied taxation will recognize the
disastrous effect that most forms of it have upon a free enterprise
system. And the deeper he goes into the subject, the more aware he
becomes of one kind of tax that not only has no harmful effect upon
productive activity, but actually has a beneficial effect. (House &
Home, the leading magazine for the construction industry, has pointed
this out several times in the past few years.)
As each community grows, the rental value of its land, as distinguished
from improvements, grows with it. And as public funds are spent for
streets, highways, irrigation projects, schools and the maintenance of
law and order, the value of the land benefited by these public
improvements is maintained and increased. So what is more logical than
for each community to recover as much of this publicly created value as
possible - thus making it unnecessary to levy taxes on privately created
values such as homes, factories, machinery, earned income and all the
wealth produced by those not on a public payroll?
It is significant that years ago at one of the annual meetings of the
American Economic Association, the subject of land value taxation was
thoroughly discussed and an overwhelming majority of those present
agreed to the following points:
- The site value of land is a creation of the community, not a
creation of the landholder.
- A tax levied on the site value of land cannot be shifted or
recovered from the tenant by raising his rent.
- A tax on the site value of land is burdenless. The community, in
taxing site value, is merely recovering a value it has created.
Recently Dr. Glenn Hoover, former president of the Pacific Coast
Economic Association, stated that most economists today would agree on
these points.
Opponents of land value taxation are very prone to hurl the word "confiscation"
at those who favor securing as much public revenue as possible from the
publicly created rental value of land. But obviously all taxation is
confiscation. And the type of confiscation we should abhor is the
confiscation of privately created values that ought to remain in private
hands as a spur to the creation of more wealth. The only way we can
really protect privately created values and keep them free of taxes is
to confine taxation as much as possible to the publicly created value of
land.
When we don't make full use of this natural source, citizens are
encouraged to speculate in land, diverting savings from productive uses
and causing the price of land to climb. Local, state and federal
governments are forced to levy taxes on privately created: values like
homes, incomes and purchases. Public spending becomes uncontrollable
because of the influence of lobbies favoring public works that will
benefit certain land holdings at the expense of those who pay income,
sales and gasoline taxes. And slums grow in the center of cities as a
direct result of undertaking valuable land while taxing owners who
improve their land.
|