






















|
Taking the Professor for a Ride
Mason Gaffney
[Reprinted from The Freeman, November, 1942.
The writer of this article, MASON GAFFNEY, is a young Chicago Georgist
who recently matriculated at Harvard. Editor's note: Perusal of the
piece suggests that Freshman Gaffney's chances of becoming teacher's
pet in the economics class are decidedly slim.]
UNRUFFLED, composed, like a patient father straightening out a
wayward son, he said, "You see, my boy, this Henry George lived
at a time when the country was growing rapidly, when land values were
skyrocketing and great fortunes were being made from speculation. Not
being a 'trained economist,' George attached disproportionate
importance to this . . . er . . . er . . . land question. Land is, of
course, of minor importance in 'economics,' and speculation, well, . .
. of trifling significance."
I should like to take this man, my "economics" teacher at
Harvard, for a ride from the North Shore area near Chicago straight
west on Illinois 58. A well-built-up residential district, one-half to
a mile deep, runs far north along the lake shore, to end abruptly in a
wilderness of sidewalks, street signs, fire plugs and weeds -- but not
buildings. Along the roads which gridiron this wasteland speed trucks
and pleasure cars, burning gas, tired and time to bridge the miles
which, to no purpose, stand between the metropolis and outlying
communities.
"Yes," my boss told me as we were riding to work one day, "there
was a time when we thought there would be a lot of building out here.
Guess I've still got some Land Company bonds in the Wilmette Bank. The
company gave the farmer one-third down and agreed to pay the rest when
the land was sold. Lots of poor farmers have got the land back now,
with stiff taxes to pay on the improvements. Improvements, hell! Those
fire plugs don't even have water pipes attached to them."
Ten miles of this and we reach Des Plaines, an oasis called by the
natives a "successful development." "Thirty-one minutes
to the Loop," boasts the Northwestern R. R. "These Homesites
Best Speculation in Chicago Land," exults the land promoter.
Five miles farther west, about fifteen miles from Lake Michigan, the
land is at last completely given over to farms. The speculator fires a
parting shot at us as we reach the junction with Arlington Heights
Road. "The Idle Rich of Today Bought Acres Yesterday," reads
his sign.
Yes, I would like to ride with this "economist" out here.
He would have trouble then convincing me that speculation is of
trifling significance. Probably he would say: "But the men who
hold this land are men of great foresight, very valuable men. You
can't refuse to reward foresight; it's a virtue. Of course a little
planning might alleviate these dreadful conditions, but, tut, tut, my
boy, do you want to destroy free enterprise?"
Reward foresight indeed! Foresight in itself deserves no economic
reward. Hitler and Baby-face Nelson at times showed great foresight,
yet their loot is by no means sanctified on that account. Only one
kind of exertion deserves an economic reward, and that is exertion
directed toward the gratification of human desires. Foresight, an
attribute of labor, exerted in producing wealth, deserves a reward,
and in the free market will bring a reward. But foresight no more
justifies speculation in land than superior firepower justifies
conquest.
Perhaps it is asking too much to expect a Harvard man to understand
this, however. His salary, after all, is paid in part from the
proceeds of the foresight of certain friends of the institution who
bought up much of the land on which the slums and business districts
of Cambridge now stand.
|