.
| On Patents
and Copyrights |
Following the habit of confounding the exclusive right granted by a
patent and that granted by a copyright as recognitions of the right of
labor to its intangible productions, I in this fell into error which I
subsequently acknowledged and corrected in the Standard of June 23,
1888. The two things are not alike, but essentially different. The
copyright is not a right to the exclusive use of a fact, an idea, or a
combination, which by the natural law of property all are free to use;
but only to the labor expended in the thing itself. It does not prevent
any one from using for himself the facts, the knowledge, the laws or
combinations for a similar production, but only from using the identical
form of the particular book or other production--the actual labor which
has in short been expended in producing it. It rests therefore upon the
natural, moral right of each one to enjoy the products of his own
exertion, and involves no interference with the similar right of any one
else to do likewise.
The patent, on the other hand, prohibits any one from doing a similar
thing, and involves, usually for a specified time, an interference with
the equal liberty on which the right of ownership rests. The copyright
is therefore in accordance with the moral law--it gives to the man who
has expended the intangible labor required to write a particular book or
paint a picture security against the copying of that identical thing.
The patent is in defiance of this natural right. It prohibits others
from doing what has been already attempted. Every one has a moral right
to think what I think, or to perceive what I perceive, or to do what I
do--no matter whether be gets the hint from me or independently of me.
Discovery can give no right of ownership, for whatever is discovered
must have been already here to be discovered. If a man make a
wheelbarrow, or a book, or a picture, he has a moral right to that
particular wheelbarrow, or book, or picture, but no right to ask that
others be prevented from making similar things. Such a prohibition,
though given for the purpose of stimulating discovery and invention,
really in the long run operates as a check upon them."
|