[Reprinted from Land and Freedom, March-April 1938]
|
Land is sometimes classified into marginal, super-marginal and submarginal. These terms are self
defining when it is understood that marginal land is used
as will produce common wages; that is, a common
average living, and nothing more, to the occupant, upon
the application of the average amount of labor and capital
Ricardo's Law of Rent may be stated thus: Rent is
the excess value or product of any land above the poorest
grade of land in common use, or marginal land. It may
be illustrated as follows:
If marginal land will produce 25 bushels of corn per acre
with the average application of labor and capital, its
product constitutes common wages only. It has no rental
value.
If other land will produce 50 bushels of corn per acre
with the same application of labor and capital, the excess
25 bushels, constitutes ground rent, and is attributable to
the quality or location of the land itself, rather than to
the labor and capital employed. The excess is a gift of
nature. It belongs equally to all men ; and since it cannot
be apportioned, it belongs to society.
As between landlord and tenant, this excess, or ground
rent, is taken by the landlord, since the tenant is entitled
only to common or average wages.
Super-marginal land will yield not only wages (and
interest) on the labor and capital applied, but ground rent
in addition, which is the share taken by the landlord
and for which he makes no return. It is a monopoly
income; and gives such land commercial value.
It is this that makes land so desirable an investment
for those who want an income without effort. The
income is at the expense of the public.
Ricardo's Law of Rent is a natural law. It cannot be
outmoded, as some say, nor repealed. As well try
repeal the law of gravitation.
Ground rent cannot be added to the price of corn, for
the excess corn is itself the ground rent, and has cost
nothing. The price of corn is fixed by the cost of producing it on marginal land.
|