.
| [Reprinted from the
Henry George News, March, 1971] |
IN the final chapter of Progress and Poverty Henry George
looked behind the problem of social life to the individual life, and to
the meaning of life itself. To him life here "was intelligible only
as the avenue and vestibule to another life." He had a sense of
mission and did not spare himself but threw all his strength and energy
into a plea for human progress and a more ideal republic.
Now that America has become in many respects the envy of the world, our
young people take the affluence for granted and spurn its material
advantages. They seek more "fulfilling work" than that of well
paid office employees. Many of them are willing to work with their hands
and to endure discomfort in order to achieve creativity.
Overwhelming too is the lure of the land which draws many away from the
stultifying routine of commuting to the city. Whether they realize it or
not, the commune dwellers are trying to escape from the demoralizing
effect of an unjust system of land tenure which reduces the less
privileged to grinding poverty.
Too few philosophers have revealed any clear understanding of the
psychological distresses which arise when men are separated from the
land. Man comes from the land and returns to it. It is part of him and
he is part of it. When he is forced into the cities he may be
politically and socially free but he does not always feel free. More
often he leads the life of "quiet desperation" of which
Thoreau wrote.
Urban life has become too complex, too sophisticated, too pointless.
Young people tend to gravitate to the opposite - to simplicity. They
feel if they could return to the simple life of their forefathers they
would gain some elusive thing that has been lost. For them the growth of
civilization seems to have caused more problems than it is worth. They
do not see that it was only as civilization grew that imperishable
literature, divinely inspired music and ever more beautiful forms of art
were created to deepen the spiritual nature of men.
A reversion to the simple life may bring contentment for a time since
it affords release from responsibility. But sooner or later people must
turn their talents in directions that are more challenging and
ennobling. Instead of looking for an escape, one should seek out the
causes for the disappointment, frustrations, evils and emptiness of the
present. That search will necessarily lead to a study of man's
relationship with the land. Only when this relationship is understood
and corrected will our national life reflect the harmony in which
individuals may hope to achieve such creativity as they desire.
|