.
| [Reprinted from the
Illinois Georgist, Vol.4, No.1, Winter 1992] |
The "land tax" solution becomes increasingly attractive as
local governments seek new ways to meet increasing costs.
A land tax is a charge against the value of land. Land is much easier
to evaluate, than buildings. Two lots side by side -- one with a house
and one without -- probably have about the same value, so the owners
would pay the same amount of tax.
Secondly, a land tax taxes things that the community creates. For
example, if a city has a good fire department, or good sewers, land wilt
derive value from these things. If there is good transportation in the
neighborhood, this wilt add to land value. If people are building nice
homes in the neighborhood, land prices will reflect this. All of these
things create land value.
In general, land values are not created by land owners; they are
created by the activities that late place close enough to the site to
create an effect. Land values are created by the community.
So a land tax is a charge made by the community against land values
created by the community. The tax can be viewed as rent charged by the
community for the use of the value it created.
Currently, we do not tax this way, unless we subscribe to the idea that
we owe the government rent for the privilege of owning houses; or that
they own our labor, and they, mercifully, Jet us keep some of our wages
so we can eat!
We tax capital and labor, but we have no moral claim to them. We tax
them only because we can use the government's coercive power to do so.
Kari Marx thought that government ownership of capital would create a
workers' paradise. Serfdom and slavery were based on government
ownership, or individual ownership, of other people's labor. We can all
wax eloquent about how evil those systems are, but we turn around and
use some of their basic tenets in our tax system -- and feel morally
justified in doing so!
As we tax houses and other buildings heavily, we penalize their
construction and maintenance. As we tax sales, we penalize commerce. As
we tax utility usage, we penalize warmth, communication and light. Why
must we tax the good things we want to see more of?
The effect of these taxes contributes to slum, sprawl, and suburbs.
Dunlap and Morton cheer every time Peoria raises taxes. Effectively, we
are paying people of means to leave the city. We pay the poor to stay
here, Across America, a few cities have completely succumbed to this
cancer. Many are diseased. The disease is advancing here.
Will a land tax help? Well, for starters, every place it has been
tried, specifically in Pennsylvania, it has caused more construction.
The land tax has made it more expensive to keep productive land out of
production, and has made it less expensive to use it well. Most
residential properly experiences a tower tax bill as a result. It makes
life a little easier for businesses who pay better wages, but a little
tougher for those who can afford only minimum wage. No longer is there a
penalty for keeping your house up or a subsidy for letting it run down.
Taxes can create great economic effects. Let's try one that encourages
growth. One that will help build the city. One that will get more people
employed and will raise its own tax base. We've tried everything else.
It's time to try the land tax.
|