Was Henry George's Campaign of 1886 a Mistake? |
[Reprinted from Land and Freedom,
November-December 1938]
|
| Joseph Dana Miller was
during this period Editor of Land and Freedom. Many of the
editorials published were unsigned. It is therefore possible that
Miller was not the author of this article, although the content is
thought to be consistent with his own perspectives as Editor.
|
It is a good thing to have an historic background of
the Single Tax movement in the contemplation of
certain great events that ushered it in.
There has grown up among recent adherents to our
movement an impression that the campaign of 1886 was
a mistake, that Henry George might better have devoted
himself to the writing of other great books to add to those
he had already written. This impression is rather widespread, but chiefly among those who have come late to
the ranks. To this impression Albert J. Nock, in his
admirable article on Henry George, has lent the weight
of his name.
We think the impression is wholly wrong. Mr. George
made no mistake in entering the campaign of '86. He
had what his later-day critics seem to lack a keen sense
of the dramatic. The whole world learned in this campaign who Henry George was. Not that many had any
very intelligent comprehension of what he stood for
his philosophy remained in the background, only dimly
perceived. But many did learn it and a number of great
names were emblazoned in the early chapters which
begin the annals of our movement.
Think of it! Had it not been for this campaign we
might never have heard of Father McGlynn, William
Lloyd Garrison, John S. Crosby, Ernest H. Crosby, and
many other great names. It disclosed Henry George as
perhaps the most moving orator of his time. It had
tremendous influence abroad and really started the movement of which the Henry George School is the final link
in a continuous chain. We heard him cry out at a great
meeting in that clarion voice of his: "We are firing a
cannon tonight whose echo will be heard round the world,"
and again we call attention to his sense of the dramatic.
The campaign of 1886 was the cannon whose echo was
heard round the world. In the time to come that clarion
cry will be quoted.
The campaign of '86 added to the weight and fame of
his books that were now to be carried everywhere. It
illuminated his message. Regardless of its political
effect all that aside, for no political effect was sought
the stage for the opening of the great drama was begun!
The curtain had risen.
The campaign of 1886 was no mistake. It is meaningless to assert in criticism that the time given to this campaign
might better have been devoted to the writing of another
book. Even at that time his writings were nearly complete. Mr. George was wiser than his later-day critics.
We have purposely refrained from any allusion to the
campaign of 1897, for Mr. George was in no condition to
undertake it. Yet even here it would be rash to question
his judgment. The occasion and manner of his death,
which he deliberately chose still alive to the sense of
the dramatic was no hastily conceived sacrifice. The
world in the days to come will regard it as a second
Gethsemene, the effect of which was worth the sacrifice.
|