[A review of the book, What is Cooperation? written by
James Peter Warbasse, published by The Vanguard Press, New York]
|
This is another of the Vanguard Press series treating of various phases
of social philosophies. Socialism, Single Tax, etc., are, as our readers
know, treated in books that have preceded it.
The author of this book is the outstanding authority on
Cooperation and president of the Cooperative League. Cooperative
Democracy published in 1923, and reissued in a revised edition in 1927, is the
larger work of the same author on which the present manual is based.
There is here everything the general reader will want to know of the
reasons for and history of Cooperation in the United States and in
Great Britain, in which latter country the movement has attained such
imposing proportions.
There is a chapter entitled "Criticism of Proposed Remedies" which
is, on the whole, not unfair. On the subject of the Single Tax the author
is in error in saying that "it would result in State ownership of the land."
Perhaps, however, the author means people-owned, and this would be
true in essence if not in form.
Mr. Warbasse says: "It would not change the motive nor method
of business." He is silent, however, on whether it would or would not
change the mater of distribution, and that is the important thing,
whether production be carried on cooperatively or competitively. Many
Single Taxers are affiliated with the Cooperative League, but most of us
regard it as only one of the proposals for economic betterment which
must be largely nullified as long as the source of all wealth the land
is the private possession of the few.
We may say that cooperation is better than the reasons given for it.
Under our present system it has its value; under a system where the
rent of land was taken by the people and all natural resources were
peopled-owned, there would be a vast extension of cooperative
enterprises, and these would be largely substituted for individual
enterprise, though cooperation would never wholly take its place for obvious
reasons. But its progress under economic freedom would probably
astound Mr. Warbasse if he is fortunate enough to live so long. For
the workers will then be free to cooperate as they are not now, for there
is a partner in all productive enterprises with whom real cooperation
is quite impossible the owner of the land. Men who cooperate do so
with the idea of each participating and contributing some effort which
we call labor, but the landlord contributes no effort and no capital.
Even if he throws in his land, rent free, he is only giving what was here
before him. Usually, however, he will demand to be paid for his land,
and if so there is just that much less for the real cooperators.
We have a fairly well grounded suspicion that Mr. Warbasse is not
ignorant of this fact.
|