.
| [Reprinted from Land
& Liberty, October, 1966] |
Britain has advanced more towards the totalitarian state, in the last
twelve months than in the previous twelve years, and what do we see now?
We see something like a disease spread across the country, with people
clamouring on every side for state control. The same disease runs
through every party political programme one picks up. Because many
proposals are advocated under the guise of paternalism and "social
justice" it does not alter the fact that it is authoritarianism.
State paternalism leads to the adoration of the state and involves the
subordination of the individual.
We still have an inequitable distribution of wealth in this country; we
still have people richer than they should be, and people in unjust
poverty. But instead of going to the root of things, the advocates of
paternalism and controls come along with proposals to spend millions of
pounds in welfare schemes, much of it coming out of the pockets of the
recipients themselves by way of taxation, national insurance, increased
contributions, and passed on "capital" taxes such as the
selective employment tax. When these funds are exhausted the Government
resorts to the printing press and dilutes our earnings and savings. What
kind of welfare is this?
To create the impression that profiteers and land speculators are being
soaked to pay the bill, the Government produces a Land Commission which
only toys with the problem of land speculation and ties up the
development industry with controls and disincentives. The way to deal
with the land question is not by control but by taxing the unimproved
value of the land.
We are now being told that for a man to be employed or not is the
prerogative of the state. If we are to believe that there shall be no
inherent right to give employment or to fix wages, then it necessarily
follows that a man has no inherent right to take a job - except with the
state.
Through all this state paternalism there runs the thread that Whitehall
knows best about everything that concerns our daily fives. Thus
Government by the elite is now recommended - not Government for the
people by the people. It is no wonder that proportional representation
is no longer discussed today. I am reminded of the old lady who asked
her vicar if one would have to associate with the lower orders in
Heaven. The vicar replied: "Madam so long as you feel like that
about it the matter will not arise." So we ought to have government
by the elite!
It is the ordinary man in this country who has made this country great,
not the politicians, and the Government's only business in the economic
life of the country is to see that he gets opportunity and liberty.
Anybody who is going to take away the spirit of freedom by putting the
people of this country in chains is going to do more than damage this
country - he is going to damage the whole world, for this country has
led the fight for liberty for all mankind.
|