.
On the Progress of the Georgist
Movement |
[This is a summary of
remarks made at the home of Anna George de Mille on 24 March 1939,
recorded by Margery Warriner. Reprinted from The Freeman,
May, 1939]
|
I had been afraid that the movement on the whole had gone back, the
reasons being that (judged by wisdom after the event) we had not clearly
and at all times exposed: the fallacies of socialism; we had been tied
to the political parties too much; and we had not given to the groups
which were trying to spread our philosophy that individual freedom which
we preached.
Everywhere socialism in some form is sweeping the world; it is labelled
in one country Fascism, in another Communism, in another New Dealism, in
another Labor. However high may be the ideals some Socialist groups
follow, at is well always to make it clear that Georgists are
anti-Socialists.
Further, always associate the collection of the community's ground rent
with the abolition of taxes. I myself have ceased, as far as I can, to
talk about the land question. We in England live in a country of nearly
80% town dwellers. When they hear the land question mentioned these town
dwellers immediately close their ears, believing that this applies to
agricultural and other rural pursuits and that it does not concern them.
Moreover, the generation of today is very apt to believe that the land
question was raised early in this century by the Liberal politicians of
that day and that it led to no freedom or prosperity.
As a consequence of these sentiments, I had held somewhat aloof from
the School sponsors at home and in America because I thought they too
were step-by-steppers, and I did not know until arriving in New York
that you were by no means step-by-steppers. I admire the vigor you show.
I believe you are working along right lines. Your Director fortunately
does not suffer from the faults of some other prominent Georgists -- he
encourages new workers to collaborate in the work of the School and
delegates such work to those who are keen and capable.
I have always believed in the Socratic method of teaching. I have not
the patience which I believe many of your teachers have, but I have been
particularly pleased to discover their tolerance and patience, I feel
sure, too, that the School is well-guided in avoiding the establishment
of an organization and in keeping away from party politics. I am quite
certain that in England many of our ablest men in the Georgist movement
have been handicapped by having to tow the line with a political party.
Progress can come only by gaining more knowledge. In the chaotic
condition in which the world now finds itself, it is the economic truths
which you are emphasizing so clearly which we want to spread. In a word,
progress will come by education, education, education.
I have been much encouraged in meeting Will Lissner, who commented on
my book "The Growth and Distribution of Population" (which
unfortunately is now out of print) as being one of the few books written
this century dealing with present problems purely from the Georgist
point of view. It may interest you to know that I expect a new book on "Swollen
Cities" to appear within a fortnight, and I have some hope that an
American edition may be forthcoming. I have also recently been engaged
with an American Georgist in studying conditions in Jamaica, with a view
to collaborating with her in bringing out a book about conditions there.
|