The
Antirent Riots in New York State -- 1839 |
[From a series of
essays on history published by
the Henry George School of Social
Science, New York, NY - 1967]
|
One who lives by the soil is in a better position to
comprehend the importance of land than one who earns a livelihood
commercially or industrially. The farmer's rent (in the economic sense,
not common usage) can be readily ascertained because the total produce
is apparent and easily computable. Why then, in eastern New York. alone,
did acts of violence occur between landlords and tenants during the
years from 1839 to 1845?
New York was settled originally by the Dutch, and their influence
caused the land history to develop differently from that in other
colonies. As the patroonship evolved over several decades, parts of the
manors in New York were being sold to small farmers. It was these
manors, encompassing thousands of acres, mainly along the Hudson River,
that contained the remnants of feudal Europe.
A system of leasing which had existed since the middle of the 17th
century allowed a freeholder to buy land from the lord of the manor with
a small down payment. The rental consisted of ten to twenty bushels of
wheat per hundred acres, or approximately ten percent of the yearly
produce. In addition the farmer contributed annually four fat hens (a
feudal custom) and one day's service. At the time of sale of the
property one-third to one-quarter of the proceeds went to the landlord.
After the death of Stephen Van Rensselaer in 1839 a significant change
occurred on the Rensselaerswyck manor, the largest of its kind in the
state. The sons, unlike their benevolent and charitable father, demanded
of the freeholders, all back rent and other obligations not previously
adhered to.
Armed conflicts ensued throughout Albany County and the Mohawk and
Delaware valleys, when the farmers ignored writs of ejection issued as a
result of their refusal to pay the rent. Local authorities attempted to
enforce the writs but were resisted and harrassed by farmers, sometimes
disguised as Indians. Governor Seward also felt compelled to back up the
law enforcement agencies although he favored the freeholders.
Associations and societies were formed by the tenant farmers, and
conventions were held in Berne, which became the unofficial capital of
the antirent movement. Thomas A. Devyr, Alvan Bouvay, Henry Evans and
others known as national land reformers, actively participated in the
movement even though philosophic differences emerged between them and
the anti-renters. The fierce unrest lost momentum only after several
murders had aroused public indignation against the riots.
Because the antirent agitation influenced both major political parties
a constitutional convention was called in Berne, New York in 1845.
Wearied by years of bickering the convention acted to correct some of
the abuses. The feudal tenures were abolished, also the inviolate
ownership of property and the twelve-year limit on leases of
agricultural land. Many farmers were not satisfied with these reforms
because they applied only to the future and not to the past. Limited as
the laws were in rectifying the powerful land system indigenous to New
York, they nevertheless helped to dramatize domination by the
aristocratic clique and brought into the open the iniquitous land
monopoly in the Empire State.
|