Jew and Christian: Their Common Sin and
the Common Penalty |
[Reprinted from Land and Freedom,
January-February 1938]
|
However great the differences that separate Jew and Christian, they
have this in common: the Jew professes allegiance to his Torah, and
the Christian, in professing allegiance to the Bible necessarily
accepts that part of the Bible which constitutes the Torah.
Does either Jew or Christian pay more than lip service to some of the
most vital edicts laid down by the Great Law-Giver?
If not, and if the basic principles from which spring those guiding
edicts are sound, is it necessary to look further for the cause of the
sufferings to which both Jew and Christian are subject in many of the
nations of the earth today? The answer to this question is found in
the one great truth so often proclaimed by Moses, and since his day
endorsed by all students of history and philosophy, that the violation
of any law of God (or, law of Nature, if one prefer to so regard it)
must eventually be atoned for in suffering; and that, conversely,
compliance with the law must bring corresponding benefits.
In Lev. 25:18 we read: "Wherefore you shall do my statutes, and
keep my judgments and do them; and ye shall dwell in the land in
safety." Is either Jew or Christian today dwelling in the land in
safety? Is the promise, or sequence, between cause and effect, (if one
prefer so to regard the subject) false, or have the statutes and
judgments been violated?
Not to commit the common error of dealing with general ties so vague
as to be valueless, let us be specific: What is the specific statute
the violation of which has brought destruction to the nations since
the days of Moses, and the results of which violation today bring the
persecution of Jews in one country, and the persecution of Christians
in another? It is the command stated and re-stated so plainly by
Moses, that while private property rights in labor products should be
sacredly observed (the antithesis of socialistic, communistic,
fascistic, and all other collectivist proposals), the land, the source
of all labor products "shall not be sold forever ("in
perpetuity"). Lev. 25:23.
This was not the capricious command of a leader desirous of merely
exercising authority. It was the reflection of knowledge of a basic
natural law the economic law, that to extend property rights to the
inclusion of land, is to deny true property rights, and therefore to
deny human rights.
The violation of this basic principle has brought about present world
conditions. It has caused restriction of economic opportunity, and is
thus responsible, chiefly, for a condition that leads both to the
persecution of the Jews and the dire distress of those peoples and
sects themselves, who practice the persecution.
Like capital and labor, both ignorant of the economic cause of their
plight, and consequently engaged in fighting each other, instead of
combining against their common oppression, so Jew and Christian,
equally unfamiliar with the great economic truth back of the Mosaic
command, instead of intelligently combining against the common cause
of their ills, leave unassailed that which pits Christian against Jew,
Christian against Christian, Jew against Jew, and brother against
brother, in the intensifying struggle for existence.
While the method of application obviously would not be the same in
our modern civilization, as in the crude days of Moses, the principle
back of the Mosaic command is unchangeable, eternal and impregnable.
Modern writers have evolved modern methods of application. The method
proposed by Henry George is the most practical.
|