The Deep Significance of Henry George's
Reform Proposals |
[An address delivered at Fairhope,
Alabama. Reprinted from Land and Freedom, March-April
1927]
|
In the following
address delivered at Fairhope Mr. A. E. Schalkenbach presents
his views of our principles. It will be observed that he
accentuates the ethical aspect of the question, which is the
side that most appeals to him. Mr. S. is a brother of Robert
Schalkenbach and a director of the Robert Schalkenbach
Foundation.
|
According to my views we Single Taxers here in Fairhope are engaged
in something more than demonstrating a better, a more scientific
method of raising public revenues, although we do claim that our
method as a fiscal measure is far superior to any other method known.
We challenge the moral right to impose the present outrageous system
upon society because it violates the inherent rights of the
individual.
We regard men as being equally entitled to the natural opportunities
that the world affords, because all men must have access thereto in
order to live at all. We believe our present system of private
property in land compels the landless to accept such terms as the land
holder is willing to give in order to have the right to life, which is
unnatural and therefore morally wrong. We repudiate the policy that
makes some men owners of the land which in turn makes them owners of
those who have no land.
We believe that a man has a right to all things that he produces. If
he catches fish in the ocean he has a right to the fish but not to the
ownership of the ocean. If he builds a windmill he is entitled to the
power he gets and the things he makes, but has no right to the
ownership of the air. If he raises crops he is the rightful owner of
the crops but not the sun and land that brought them forth.
To attach to the natural forces the same right of ownership that
attaches to the things man produces is a denial of the true rights of
property. A man who out of the product of his labor is obliged to pay
another for the use of the ocean, the air, the sunshine or the soil,
which may all be properly classed as land, that man is denied his
inherent right and is being robbed. We recognize, however, the
absolute necessity for security of private possession so long as it
does not interfere with the rights of others. We do not propose equal
rights to land by common possession, letting anyone use it when it
pleases him so to do, nor do we propose to divide it up in parts or
equal shares. We propose leaving it in possession of the holder with
full liberty to give or bequeath. We would simply levy for public
purposes a tax that will equal the annual value of the land itself
irrespective of any improvements thereon, and since this tax would be
enough for public necessities we would repeal all other taxes,
federal, state or otherwise, now levied on the products of human
labor.
We believe these taxes check industry, check commerce; they punish
thrift, they prevent the largest production and a fair division of
wealth; they encourage monopoly and other social evils too numerous to
mention.
The annual rental value that we propose to collect for all public
necessities does not come from any exertion of labor, physical or
mental, or the investment of capital on the part of the individual,
but is the direct result of increasing population and social progress
and therefore is the natural fund that should be collected for public
purposes.
The collection of land values irrespective of improvements does not
lessen the reward of industry, add to prices or take away from the
individual anything that belongs to him. It takes only what the
community as a whole produces. To take land values for all public
purposes, abolishing all taxes on the products of labor, would leave
the producer the full product of his energies and therefore all that
rightfully belongs to him.
The refusal to collect the full annual rental value of land for
public purposes necessitates the collection of taxes that lessen
production; it allows a few to take what belongs to all. It foregoes
the only means by which it is possible to combine the security of
possession that is necessary to improvement with the equality of
natural opportunity, which is the greatest of all natural rights.
The collection of land values prevents land speculation because the
seller of land has no capitalized rent or property value to sell;
nothing except his improvements. The collection of land values
encourages the building of the best types of buildings, causing more
beautiful homes and adding to the beauty of the community. It creates
a demand for better and more skilled labor, thus producing in turn
general prosperity. It discourages the wastefulness of not using land
for its best purposes and forces into use land that now is held idle
awaiting the individual who through necessity must pay a monopoly
price.
The founders of Fairhope believed in the principles I have just set
forth and in so far as the federal and state laws would permit they
have founded this Single Tax Colony pledged to carry out these
principles, welcoming to their midst any and all who desire to accept
the advantages thereof and aid in the demonstration that they believe
must lead to universal practice in all civilized
countries."
|