.
Rand and
the Russians
[A review of
Ayn Rand: The Russian Radical,
by Chris Matthew Sciabarra
(University Park, PA,
Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995, 477 pages)] |
[Reprinted from Fragments,
Winter, 1995-1996]
|
It took Professor Sciabarra many years of research to write an
intriguing new book about Ayn Rand. This one deals with Russian thought,
and establishes the theme that, whether she was aware of it or not, Rand
was deeply influenced by Russian philosophy -- especially as she learned
it from Nicholas Lossky, her professor in Petrograd. Lossky also
introduced her to Aristotle; Rand subsequently viewed "her own
system as the heir to Aristotelianism." (p.19)
Sciabarra further contends that Rand was also influenced by the Russian
Marxists, whose dogma she bitterly denounced throughout her mature and
formative life in America. "From a historical vantage point,"
Sciabarra declares, Rand's philosophy was "an evolved response to
the dualities that Rand confronted in Soviet Russia. Although she
rejected both the mysticism of Russia's religious traditions and the
secular collectivism of the Russian Marxists, she nonetheless remained a
profoundly Russian thinker." (p.10)
"No theme," he continues, "has been more central to the
history of Russian thought than ... [the] struggle against dualism. It
emerges from a desire to transcend the dichotomies that fragment human
existence: spirit versus flesh, reason versus emotion, the moral versus
the practical. This yearning to achieve synthesis ... was fully absorbed
by Ayn Rand." (pp.23-24)
Rand accepted and followed the struggle against formal dualism. The
method used by the Russian thinkers (especially the Russian Marxists) in
their "revolt against dualism" is called "dialectics."
Even though Rand always contended that she was adamantly opposed to the
dialectical approach, there appears to be evidence that "Rand had
absorbed, perhaps unwittingly, crucial dialectical methods of analysis."
(p.9)
According to Sciabarra, there are "provocative parallels"
between the methods of Marxists and Rand. "Both Marx and Rand
traced the interconnectedness of social phenomena... Both Marx and Rand
opposed the mind-body dichotomy... But unlike Marx, Rand was virulently
anticommunist. Unlike Marx, Rand viewed a genuinely capitalist social
system for the achievement of truly integrated human being.
Paradoxically, Rand seemed to embrace a dialectical perspective that
resembled the approach of her Marxist political adversaries, even while
defending capitalism as an 'unknown ideal.'" (pp.8-9)
What is the meaning of "dialectics"?
"The best way to understand... [it] is to view it as a technique
to overcome formal dualism.... A thinker who employs a dialectical
method embraces neither a pole nor the middle of a duality of extremes.
Rather, the dialectical method anchors the thinker to both camps.... In
some cases, the transcendence of opposing points of view provides a
justification for rejecting both alternatives as false." (p.16)
In Rand's "revolt against formal dualism," she transcends
such opposites and "false alternatives" as materialism and
idealism, intrinsicism and subjectivism, rationalism and empiricism,
mind and body, reason and emotion, fact and value, theory and practice.
"For Rand, these factors are distinctions within an organic unity.
Neither can be fully understood in the absence of the other, since each
is an inseparable aspect of a wider totality.... It is this emphasis on
the totality that is essential to the dialectical mode of inquiry.
Dialectics is not merely a repudiation of formal dualism. It is a method
that preserves the analytical integrity of the whole." (p.17)
And thus, Sciabarra argues, Rand, like her Russian "opponents,"
employed the dialectical method in her philosophy.
Also, Rand subscribed to the "Russian view" (again according
to Sciabarra) that mere philosophic contemplation is considered
incomplete; "it required consummation in the quest for
truth-justice." (p.297) (emphasis supplied)
The above "similarities" in the works of Rand and the Russian
thinkers (our author contends) prove his thesis that traditionally
Rand was a Russian thinker, and was influenced (in method at least) by
her compatriots.
So much for Rand's "debt" to Russia. What were her original
contributions, that made Rand famous and unique?
"Rand's goal in writing was 'the projection of an ideal man."'
She also aimed to "reconnect" the elements in human existence
which Kant supposedly "had severed." (p.97) She stressed the
law of identity. (pp.49-51) She championed reason and freedom, which
alone (she said) could defeat faith and force. She propounded the theory
of individualism, but emphasized the need for sociality. As humans we
need social contacts. (p. 270) Rand espoused the ethics of selfishness,
opposing it to the prevailing creed of altruism. She wrote: "The
true, highest selfishness, the exalted egoism, is the right to have
one's own theoretical values and then apply them to practical reality."
(p.234)
"In her emphasis on the ontological priority of individuals, Rand
did not dissolve reality into wholly independent entities.... Everything
is interrelated." (p. 144) However, "by stressing the
ontological priority of individuals, Rand rejected the metaphysical
basis of organic collectivism." (p.269)
Rand's greatest achievement was to glorify capitalism. Calling herself
a "radical for capitalism," she declared that capitalism was
made possible by the rebirth of reason. "The capitalist system...
was based on the volitional exchange of values." (p.330)
Of eourse (in Rand's estimation), the eternal arch-enemy of humankind
is the murderous, predatory, racist, military, slave-creating monster:
the State.
Chris Matthew Sciabarra wrote a powerful book. It is not easy reading,
but it is a MUST for all Randians, all individualists, and all men and
women who believe in and live by the precepts of truth, reason, and
freedom.
|