The Land Problem in Mexico |
[Reprinted from Land and Freedom, July-August 1940]
|
The history of Mexico is a history of a struggle for the
soil of the country.
Mayas, Zapotecs, Toltecs, Anahuacs, in slow succession
rose to power and affluence, became luxurious and corrupt,
and disappeared before the onslaughts of fresher, more
vigorous tribes who fought to possess the land.
No matter how they may have differed as to tribal and
religious customs, all these ancient Mexicans had common
ideas regarding the soil. Land was not held as private property. Its ownership was vested in the tribe. Each family,
however, was allotted a piece of land which it cultivated
independently. Certain lands were reserved for the expenses
of the government and the support of the priests. These
lands were cultivated by the common people.
In the fifteenth century, in the territories controlled by the
Aztecs, the last of the Anahuacs, the powers of the nobles
were increasing and some of them had acquired lordship
over lands which had belonged to conquered tribes and had
reduced their inhabitants to serfdom. A feudal form of society was thus in process of development.
It was against this sort of social structure that Cortez
hurled his gold-thirsty adventurers. Aided by other dissident
tribes he soon conquered the effete and luxurious Montezuma, Emperor of the Aztecs, and hushed the country into
peace by the power of his sword.
Along with his awe-inspiring equipment Cortez also
brought the feudal ideas of his homeland. The conquered
lands, belonging nominally to the Spanish Crown, were divided in most part amongst his officers. Later, when the
cross followed the sword, lands were also granted by the
crown for the benefit of the Church. All these lands were
cultivated by the original inhabitants who became mere serfs.
For himself, Cortez obtained the Marquesaclo del Valle
which measured 25,000 square miles, contained 22 towns and
counted a population of 100,000 souls. Mines, woods, waters,
the entire civil and criminal jurisdiction, and the right to the
labor of the inhabitants were included in this entailed estate
which, being inalienable, passed to the direct descendants.
One lieutenant got 10,000 square miles with its rich silver
mines. Another received Xilotepec which included 130,000
vassals. Others received grants in proportion to their supposed merits.
On all of these great entailed estates the natives were
ground with a remorseless fury. At first the Church protested against the barbarous cruelties inflicted upon the hapless
people but soon, it too, was involved in the process of wringing wealth from the serfs and the soil. The Spanish Crown,
despite its many shortcomings, did its futile best to curb the
ferocious power of the landlords.
The poor natives whipped by man and scourged by
famine had but a choice of suicide or flight to enable the
to escape their harsh taskmasters. Thousands chose both
these avenues of release from a life of unremitting misery.
It was to lure the Indian back from his retreat in the
jungles and mountain fastnesses that the ejido was conceived. The ejidos were plots of ground that were allotted
the native. They were supposed to be inalienable and for
them, in his spare time, he was expected to raise his own
sustenance, the King's tribute, and contributions to the
clergy.
No sooner were the ejidos granted than the great landlords by dint of force, bribery and deception began gradually
to enclose them. Thus began the struggle between great landlord and poor peasant which has survived to this day and
which has caused one bloody revolt after another.
The revolutions of Mexico have been essentially agrarian
in character a struggle between the landed and the landless.
It was the disinherited and ragged outcasts who flocked
to the standards of Hidalgo and Morelos in 1810. For them
it was a burning agrarian struggle. And that was chiefly the
reason why it was defeated. The land holding interests combined and were too powerful to be thrown off.
In 1823 the Mexican Congress abolished the further [unreadable] of estates, but too late to repair the damage. The
Cortez heritage, for example, had grown to include one city,
157 towns, 89 great estates, 119 farms and 5 ranches with
total population of nearly 200,000 souls.
Meanwhile the Church also had entered the picture on a
grand scale and by mortmain controlled "not less than one-half the real estate of the country." That was the estimate
of Lucas Alaman, the clerical leader. It held mortgages on
most of the remaining agricultural properties and had become the national money lender. Owing to special cleric
privileges and exemptions, independent agriculture suffered
a constant handicap and the Church was able to undersell
other growers, thereby lowering market values. The Church,
of course, paid no salaries, rents, interest, excises or taxes
of any kind.
It has been estimated that the Texan revolt and the subsequent war with the United States in 1845, cost the people of
Mexico one-half of their land. President Grant, a participant
in the war, later characterized it "as one of the most unjust
ever waged by a stronger against a weaker nation."
In 1856 the feeble Comonfort government ordered the
sale of clerically owned estates to the lessees at a price based
on a rental value of six per cent, or, should the renter
desire to buy, the property could be condemned and sold to
the highest bidder. This effort was no stronger than the government that sponsored it and was soon discarded.
Emperor Maximilian and Empress Carlotta were shocked
by the conditions they found. They decreed in vain that the
peon was responsible only for his own debts and not
those of his father. In vain did they seek to shorten his hours
of toil. In vain was corporal punishment forbidden.
The Great Reform Laws of Juarez in 1867 also attempted
to restore the lands to the people but were checkmated at
every turn by the combined weight of landlords and clergy.
Nevertheless constant effort was exerted to relieve the condition of the disinherited.
In the late eighties and nineties, under the aegis of Porfirio
Diaz, the pendulum swung the other way. The peon reached
his nadir. This was the era of railroad construction and influx of foreign capital. As a consequence, tilled and untilled
lands acquired new values. A great wave of speculation
swept over the country. The foreigner was quick to scent
the exploitive possibilities of the situation and the condition
of the people became more and more intolerable. They partially threw off the yoke in 1911 and then followed the revolutionary movement, aimed at land reform, which has continued to this day.
A succession of leaders promised, deceived and were
overthrown or assassinated. Then a champion, Emiliano
Zapata, purest and fairest of all, glowed like a bright star
gainst this sombre background. His slogan was "Land and
Liberty." He demanded freedom from the feudal oppression
of the great estates and restoration of the ancient village
lands. Zapata was betrayed and slain, but not until he had
advanced considerably the cause of the peasants.
Plutarco Elias Calles was the next important political
figure to dominate the scene. Calles really seemed to have
the interest of the peasants at heart and pushed agrarian reforms with unceasing zeal. He advanced the cause of the
ejido and loosened the clutching grip of the Church. In the
fields of labor his right hand man, Morones, organized the
Confederacion Regional Obrera Mexicana, or C.R.O.M., as
it was popularly called. This was a confederation of craft
unions organized on the same basis as the American Federation of Labor.
However, it soon became apparent that though the zeal of
Zalles continued, as far as agrarian reform was concerned,
it seemed to manifest a marked antipathy toward urban
labor developments. In some peculiar way, known only to
5enor Calles, he had become one of the richest industrialists
in the country. His interests embraced many industries and
it became particularly incensed at any threat of strike on the
part of labor. There was a clash of interests. The original
crusading zeal of the once poor school-master was quenched.
Senor Morones and the small clique who dominated the
Z.R.O.M., were also faring very well. They dashed about in
the most expensive automobiles and the diamonds flashed by
Morones became a public scandal. They all lived lavishly and their week-end parties in the suburb of Tlalpan were
notorious. They formed a club called the Grupo Accion,
which for luxury was unequalled except by millionaires'
clubs in the United States.
Now Calles had always chosen the current presidential
candidate. Against the advice of conservative friends he
selected Lazaro Cardenas to succeed the safe and pliable
gambling concessionaire, Abelardo Rodriguez. He was sure
that he would be able to control Cardenas as he had controlled Rodriguez, Ortiz Rubio, and other presidential
puppets. But this time it was different.
Everyone winked and grinned when Cardenas spoke of
land reform, better conditions for labor and a democratized
army. They had heard all this so many times before. But
when the new president swung into action and began to put
his reforms into effect, the grins faded.
Meanwhile, the Marxian-inspired Vicente Lombardo Toledano had broken off from the old, corrupt C.R.O.M., and
formed the Mexican Confederation of Labor or C.T.M., as
it is known. It was organized on the basis of Industrial
Unionism and it established friendly relations with the
American C.I.O.
The Army' stood firmly behind the new president. With
the backing of peasants, workers and soldiers, Cardenas
was able to drive Calles, Morones and their satellites from
the country.
Let no one be so naive as to suppose that Justice and
Liberty have but to raise their heads to have Injustice and
Bondage flee before them. Over and over again they have
been trampled into the bloody mud. And so after centuries
of struggle, sacrifice, torture and death, the advent of Lazaro Cardenas in 1934 still found the Mexicans in the grip
of the great estates. The reason for this is simple. When the
landed interests found themselves defeated in the agrarian
areas they transferred their maleficent activities to other
spheres. They packed the state governments, the courts, the
labor tribunals, the local magistracies and the police, with
their creatures. Their company guards roamed the countryside and spread terror in the hearts of the people. On an
average, it required five years to press a successful suit
through the courts.
Cardenas, supported by the rising tide of the labor movement under Lombardo Toledano was able to purge all these
agencies of their reactionary and venal elements. New life
seemed to surge through the courts and the monotonous line
of decisions in favor of the landlords was broken.
Although from 1913 through 1934 about 20 million acres
of land had been distributed, yet ninety-five per cent of all
farm land was in holdings of over 250 acres (i.e., sufficiently large to require several outside laborers). 55 per cent was
in holdings of over 25,000 acres each.
During the five years of the Cardenas incumbency more
peasants have received land than in all the previous years
put together and the per capita share has been almost twice
as large. From 1915 through 1934, 20 million acres had been
distributed. From 1935 through 1938, nearly 40 million acres.
From 1915 through 1934, 759,000 heads of peasant families
had received land. From 1935 through 1938, 813,000. It has
been estimated that by the end of 1938, 41 per cent of the
arable land had been turned over to ejidos. And the process
has been continuing since.
To sustain these moves Cardenas has set up a new institution, The National Bank of Ejido Credit, with branches in
the chief agricultural regions.
There is a new Agrarian Department, a large part of
whose duties consists in care and advice for ejidos. The
members of this department flow from the newly established
agricultural schools.
The Irrigation Commission is in process of revitalization
and has borne fruit already in the great Laguna cotton
growing region where the Palmito Dam has been constructed.
Furthermore, since 1935 the majority of new ejidos have
been set up in collective form and on a bookkeeping basis.
Moreover they have been set up in precisely those regions
where collective agriculture can be most effective, namely,
the regions of the great commercial crops cotton, rice,
hemp and wheat. A beginning has also been made in sugar
cane and bananas. By the end of 1939 about one-third of all
ejidos were in collective form, and they controlled the majority of Mexico's chief cash and export crops.
Though, as before stated, these gains are due chiefly to
the revival of the labor movement and its effect upon the
whole federal administration, yet Cardenas has steadfastly
refused to allow himself to become a pawn in the hands of
the Marxist labor leaders. He is, above all, a patriot, a Mexican and true to his Indian heritage.
Here is the man of the centuries, defender of the oppressed, champion of champions. And while he fights the
privileged groups of his homeland and struggles against governmental pressure from abroad, he must whirl to stamp
out the treachery inspired by greed of gain in his own ranks.
He has the brave heart and the sturdy will that seeks economic freedom for the masses. But he does not know the
way.
A presidential election has recently been held in Mexico.
The results, not yet announced, will decide whether the
liberal policies of Cardenas will be followed, or whether the
forces of oppression will once more gain the upper hand.
But even if the man of Cardenas' choice is elected, the hopeless economic maze constructed by the liberal government
is not the solution.
Would that a copy of Progress and Poverty were put
in the hands of Mexico's leaders!
|