.
Often called the founder of modern economics,
Adam Smith, b. Kirkcaldy, Scotland, June 5, 1723, d. July 17, 1790, was
a wide-ranging social philosopher and economist whose masterwork, An
Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776), is
one of the most influential studies of Western civilization.
Smith's intellectual interests were extensive. He
wrote an important philosophical treatise, The Theory of Moral
Sentiments (1759), was well versed in science and history, and counted
philosopher David Hume and inventor James Watt among his friends. He
studied at Glasgow and Oxford universities, lectured at the University
of Edinburgh, and in 1751 became a professor at Glasgow University. In
1764-66 he made a grand tour of the Continent as tutor to the young duke
of Buccleuch.
Smith's major thesis in The Wealth of Nations was
that, except for limited functions (defense, justice, certain public
works), the state should refrain from interfering with the economic life
of a nation (see laissez-faire). Smith did not view favorably the
motives of merchants and businessmen. "People of the same trade,"
he wrote, "seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion,
but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some
contrivance to raise prices." He suggested, however, that
businessmen seeking their own interest are led "as if by an
invisible hand" to promote the well-being of society.
This position is supported in The Wealth of Nations
by an elaborate analysis of how economic systems function and develop
over time. Smith sought to show how competition in the marketplace would
lead businessmen to supply the goods consumers want, to produce these
goods efficiently, and to charge only what they are worth. He saw
monopoly, whether private or state-imposed, as the evil to be combated,
and competition (see monopoly and competition) as promoting the best
interests of society. He further argued that economic growth, which
depends upon capital accumulation [see capital (economics)] and an
increased division of labor, would be promoted best by private rather
than public efforts. People would save and invest for the future because
of the inherent desire of individuals to better their own condition.
Finally, he sharply criticized the mercantilist writers of his day who
advocated state intervention in international trade to achieve an inflow
of foreign treasure. Smith claimed, perhaps somewhat unfairly, that
mercantilism confused money and wealth, ignoring the fact that the only
real purpose of money is to purchase goods. He maintained that free
trade increased the wealth of nations, while restrictions on trade
diminished wealth.
|