.
| [Reprinted from The
Gargoyle, October 1965] |
The Henry George School is an educational institution, tax-exempt, and
non-political. It cannot therefore endorse any political issue or
candidate.
As an individual, I of course, might take any part I desire in
politics, but since I am Director of the New Jersey school, I refrain
from so doing. I feel that no matter how careful I am to clearly state I
am acting as an individual, my statements and or actions are likely to
be "associated" with the school. It goes without saying that
others active with the school should be cautious so as not to involve
the school in statements they may make.
It is the practice of the school in educational efforts, to seek and
present facts, then encourage individuals to reach their own
conclusions. In this article I merely wish to set forth a few facts in
connection with the immediate political activity in New Jersey. This
year a Governor is to be elected. The two major parties will offer
candidates and the present Governor, Richard J. Hughes will seek
re-election. State Senator Wayne Dumont, Jr., will oppose Hughes as the
candidate of the other regular party. A third candidate is Robert
Schlachter running as an independent.
One of the leading issues of the campaign is state finance and
taxation. Hughes favors a sales tax but has stated he will "accept"
an income tax, lottery, or other means of raising revenue. Dumont
indicates he will promote income tax. Schlachter will run on the
platform of no new taxes, declaring economy in state and local
government would obviate the necessity of additional revenue.
The Henry George School of New Jersey in presenting the basic course in
Fundamental Economic principles endeavors to indicate three most
important factors:
- Distinction between natural resources and man-made products.
- Source of governmental revenue -- taxation a means of collecting
revenue.
- Limited government, operated with economy and efficiency.
Action can be taken immediately for more efficient and economical local
and state government, as well as Federal, This is both a short and a
long term program but the start ought to be made.
It must be recognized that taxes are not sources of government revenue.
Once this is understood, all forms of taxation -- sales, income,
property; may be seen in their true perspective. It will be recognised
that the portion of the general property, or real estate tax, which is
assessed against land falls upon natural resources. The portion of this
tax which is assessed against improvements (buildings) personal, and
business-personal property falls upon man made products.
Economics indicates the only way to obtain material things is to
produce them. Any interference with production -- taxes, or government
controls and regulation -- tend to reduce production. Therefore, a part
of the general property tax, sales and income taxes, definitely
interfere with and lessen production.
The portion of the general property tax which falls upon land cannot
decrease production but rather tends to increase it by lowering rents,
selling price of land and discouraging holding land out of use for
speculation. It follows that attention ought be given to the proper
assessing of land for taxation. If this is done and all land is assessed
at its true or market value as the Constitution of the State provides,
an increase in revenue from this source should be immediately
forthcoming.
The longer term program should aim at the reducing and eventually
eliminating sales and income taxes, excise and other taxes, including
those on improvements, personal and business-personal property. With
efficient and economic operation of local, state and Federal Government
and reduction of the activities of all government, the revenue which
might be obtained from the one source (natural resources) might
conceivably furnish the bulk if not the entire revenue needed for
government.
"Economics" teaches us what might be expected. It is up to us
to act politically in such manner as our knowledge of economics,
taxation and government directs.
|