[Reprinted from a pamphlet published in
San Francisco, California, 1937]
|
IF YOUR HOUSE was on fire and your piano needed tuning, to which would
you telephone first: The Fire Department or the piano tuner? If a
sane, intelligent ism-less means for ending our economic distress were
at hand and a host of futile panaceas were also before you, which
would you choose: Ending your evils or poulticing your wounds?
If you were laboring, struggling, striving and failing under an Ism
that was certain to keep you in misery, why would you care if you were
threatened with Communism or Fascism in exchange for your present Ism?
Well, your house is on fire and the remedy is at hand and you are
struggling against as miserable an Ism as any that you fear, so why
don't you wake up Mr. Business Man and Mr. Professional Man and Mr.
Working Man and Mr. Artist and Mr. Artisan and Mr. Farmer and Mr.
Merchant and Mr. Inventor and all you Misters who have ideas' and
products and services to sell or provide, and who do good work and who
ought to be well rewarded for it!
For the Ism you labor under is LANDLORDISM! AND LANDLORDISM IS
RESPECTABLE RACKETEERING.
No matter how many other evils are corrected, as long as this evil
exists it will absorb or annul the benefits that might be gained by
correcting any of the others, and in fact until it is corrected they
cannot be.
And the remedy, so simple, so long before us, so thoroughly explained
and so plainly described (with the burdens and woes due to ignoring
it, so clearly prophesied) is simply this:
MEET PUBLICLY CREATED NEEDS BY PUBLICLY COLLECTING
PUBLICLY CREATED WEALTH. LEAVE PRIVATELY CREATED WEALTH IN THE HANDS
OF THOSE CREATING IT.
And what is publicly created wealth? And what is privately created
wealth? Publicly created wealth is the rental value of the land;
privately created wealth is money earned. Only the presence of the
people can give value to land. The value appears in rent that rises in
proportion to the numbers of the people. PUT THAT RENT IN THE PUBLIC
TREASURY. Stop taxing homes. Stop taxing industry. Stop taxing the
fruits of labor and of genius. Stop taxing anything unless you want to
destroy it. A TAX IS A PINE. Get your public revenue from the value
you publicly create.
We own our United States. We Americans. We surely own our own
country. You don't own it. I don't own it. But WE do. And we prove it
by taking a part of the land rent that we create (in the form of a
tax). And if the holder doesn't pay the little portion we now take he
forfeits the land. BUT WE LET LANDLORDS WHO GIVE NOTHING TAKE THE MOST
OF IT and then we burden ourselves in our capacity as industrialists
and workers and capitalists and in all the other forms of serving our
fellows by taxing ourselves to make up the money the landholders get
for letting us live in our own United States.
Yes, as capitalists, we need capitalists. Men who work and build and
save and plan are capitalists. A capitalist is a man who saves his
money and puts it to work. But if we were: wise, and took all the land
rental value we create, no capitalist would exchange his capital for
land.
We do not need capital to furnish land. We do need capital to prepare
it sometimes. And we need the aid of private capital for many things.
We speak of ours as a Capitalistic government. This simply means that
as yet we have not been able to distinguish between:
- Saving our money and using it as a tool, and;
- Holding an indefensible privilege.
It is as though we were to refer to ourselves as maintaining a
Firearmistic government and were incapable of distinguishing between
those men who bore firearms in defense of the public good and those
who bore firearms for the purpose of holding people up!
So it was not Capitalism that spurred the Russians to bloody
revolution. They had little capital in Russia. Almost none. Try to
think of some big Russian company. The railroads belonged to the
State. WHAT MURDERED THEM WAS LANDLORDISM. The privilege of a few to
tax for their private purse. The Russians happened to read Marx
instead of Henry George, and mistook LANDLORDISM for Capitalism.
Capital invested in the privilege of collecting the public revenue is
money paid for the right to hold us up. Nothing else. No matter how
time-honored the custom of permitting some of us to trade in the right
to collect land rent, a public revenue, it is different in form only
from giving the privilege of trading in territory or Victimized groups
for the "protection" racket. In what one of its effects on
commerce and the public good does private collection of land rent
differ from collection of gangster protection? In what way? What
service does the landlord perform? What service does the racketeer
perform?
LANDLORDISM is the father of all monopolies. Why do we rage so about
public utilities that absorb three percent of our income and furnish
something for it, while we supinely agree to LANDLORDISM which absorbs
thirty percent and gives nothing. Regulated utilities could give
cheaper service if their equipment were freed of taxes.
Like LANDLORDISM, taxes are a heritage of the ages or man's
ignorance. There should be no taxes. A TAX IS A FINE. In what way do
they differ? To tax a productive man is to take part of his private
earnings to pay public expenses. Yet that same man by his presence
alone has made and paid land rent just that much greater than it would
be if he did not exist. No matter what his financial status or value
may be.
We Americans get along pretty well with private initiative. We need
it. We set our individual hopes by it. We have rewarded many men who
have put things at our disposal through it. A fine architect ought to
get rich. A fine doctor ought to get rich. An author who pleases. A
toolmaker. Why not? But are we so dumb that we can't discern the
difference between REWARD for service and TRIBUTE to useless
privilege? Are we so damned dumb that we are going to let ourselves
murder each other into Communism or Fascism to protect our stupid
practice of pouring public revenue into hands that do not earn it and
tearing its equivalent from hands that do earn it? Private enterprise
deserves a reward, provided it isn't the enterprise of the holdup man.
There should be rich people if their riches are secured by furnishing
something that people want and that they produce out of themselves.
Brains should be rewarded. Brains that serve and create are the only
thing of value in the world. The public does not begrudge a rich
reward for brains that serve, and we need not fear brains, for men of
true intellect do not prey upon their fellows.
Values created by individual thought and labor should stay in the
hands of that individual. Values created by the co-operation of groups
should remain in the hands of those groups. BUT VALUES CREATED BYT 0HE
PUBLIC should remain in the hands of THE PUBLIC!
One concrete instance: San Francisco's largest office building is the
Russ Building. Capital built the Russ Building and deserves a reward
for placing so fine a structure at the disposal of the people of San
Francisco. But that capital is having a hard time and is not getting
its reward. The capitalists who built that building pay taxes. The
tenants pay taxes. But the capitalists will lose their reward and
their capital, too, if they fail to continue to pay the ground rent of
their ninety-nine year lease. The ground rent to the Russ estate for
the privilege of existing in San Francisco. And what does the Russ
estate do for them? Nothing! True it may have bought the "RIGHT"
to levy tribute on the builders of the building.
But as it is an old estate you can imagine what fraction of the lease
value it paid for the landlordship. For the "right" to say
to San Franciscans "Before you step on this part of your city,
pay here!" It bought a "right" that is not a right. It
is a privilege born of public stupidity. And just as the purchaser of
stolen property loses it without recompense when the owner discovers
it, so should the public take back its self-created value by levying a
charge for rental against all the land to the full extent of its
yield. And take its collective hand out of the thinker's and the
worker's private pocket. The private collection of land value or
publicly created income is WRONG! The public appropriation of
privately earned income is WRONG! As long as we cherish and protect
something DEAD WRONG in our economics-Kill your pregnant pigs! Dole
your dole! Plough in your wheat! Tax your fine American business
structure out of existence! Putter, Peck and Dabble but don't expect
to GO Ahead. The free land is gone. The free land that made America
what she is, is gone.
|